Sequential Read Performance

Our first test of sequential read performance uses short bursts of 128MB, issued as 128kB operations with no queuing. The test averages performance across eight bursts for a total of 1GB of data transferred from a drive containing 16GB of data. Between each burst the drive is given enough idle time to keep the overall duty cycle at 20%.

Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)

The Plextor M8V has great burst sequential read performance, but most mainstream SATA drives also perform close to this level.

Our test of sustained sequential reads uses queue depths from 1 to 32, with the performance and power scores computed as the average of QD1, QD2 and QD4. Each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB transferred, from a drive containing 64GB of data.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read

On the longer sequential read test, the Plextor M8V is no longer one of the top drives but its performance is still respectable even by the standards of modern 64L 3D TLC drives.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)

The Plextor M8V's power efficiency during sequential reads is good. Samsung's drives and Toshiba's DRAMless drives are more efficient, but among other mainstream SATA SSDs the M8V comes out on top.

In absolute terms the power consumption of the M8V is higher than most other SATA drives, but the performance is high enough to largely justify the power consumption.

Sequential Write Performance

Our test of sequential write burst performance is structured identically to the sequential read burst performance test save for the direction of the data transfer. Each burst writes 128MB as 128kB operations issued at QD1, for a total of 1GB of data written to a drive containing 16GB of data.

Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)

The Plextor M8V is in a multi-way tie for second fastest burst sequential write speed. Since the top-scoring Samsung 850 PRO is on its way out, that puts the M8V in the top tier of current SSDs.

Our test of sustained sequential writes is structured identically to our sustained sequential read test, save for the direction of the data transfers. Queue depths range from 1 to 32 and each queue depth is tested for up to one minute or 32GB, followed by up to one minute of idle time for the drive to cool off and perform garbage collection. The test is confined to a 64GB span of the drive.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write

The sustained sequential write speed of the Plextor M8V reminds us that the M8V is still an entry-level SSD with some pitfalls. The M8V isn't anywhere near as slow as the TR200 or the Plextor S2C, but it can't keep up with the mainstream SATA SSDs or some of the other budget SSDs.

Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)

The power efficiency of the M8V during sustained sequential writes is relatively low, but doesn't stand out as badly as its performance score.

While clearly on the slow side, the Plextor M8V's sequential write performance is steady, with most of its performance available at QD1 and there are no signs of major problems managing the SLC cache.

Random Performance Mixed Read/Write Performance
Comments Locked

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • edgineer - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    What's the actual capacity of this drive, 476 GiB? I hate having to use a calculator/guessing.
  • Billy Tallis - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    As with any other 512GB drive, the usable capacity (before partitioning) is 512,110,190,592 bytes.
  • Dragonstongue - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    Crucial MX200 500GB ends up as 465gb usable Win 7 64 build after formatted for use
    Crucial MX100 256 ends up with 238GB usable
  • frenchy_2001 - Tuesday, March 20, 2018 - link

    That would be because Windows displays GiB (2^30 bytes) and not GB (10^9 Bytes).
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibibyte
  • bug77 - Thursday, March 22, 2018 - link

    During formatting, some space is reserved for the file system. That is not a limitation of the drive, nor does it make the drive have a smaller capacity.
    You don't like file system's overhead? Use a different file system. Oh wait, you can't do that on Windows :D
  • Holliday75 - Wednesday, March 21, 2018 - link

    These new bots are everywhere. Been seeing them all over Facebook posting on a few of my favorite professional sports teams pages.
  • FunBunny2 - Thursday, March 22, 2018 - link

    but, but, but... Mark just promised that they've been driving the culture at Facebook for years, years I say, to improve user experience. don't you believe him?????
  • leexgx - Sunday, March 25, 2018 - link

    can you please fix on mobile view in "Print this article" the "Thanks to" box overrides page width limits so when scrolling up and down it sometimes go left and right

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now